|
|
INTERESTING IMAGE |
|
|
|
Year : 2017 | Volume
: 32
| Issue : 1 | Page : 68-70 |
|
|
“Drop” metastases from an operated case of intracranial anaplastic ependymoma identified on fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Piyush Chandra, Nilendu Purandare, Sneha Shah, Archi Agrawal, Venkatesh Rangarajan
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Date of Web Publication | 17-Jan-2017 |
Correspondence Address: Venkatesh Rangarajan Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.198492
Abstract | | |
The seeding of tumor through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from primary intracranial tumors is very rare, often goes undetected, and is usually identified only on autopsy. CSF cytology along with magnetic resonance imaging constitutes the standard approach of diagnosing this grave condition. Use of fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in indentifying spinal metastases from primary intracranial malignancies is very limited and has been reported in patients with metastatic glioblastoma multiforme and medulloblastomas. We present a rare case of metastatic anaplastic ependymoma to show the potentially clinically utility of PET/CT in diagnosing leptomeningeal or the so-called “drop” metastases. Keywords: Anaplastic, cerebrospinal fluid, ependymoma, fluoro-2-deoxyglucose, leptomeningeal, magnetic resonance, metastases, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, spinal
How to cite this article: Chandra P, Purandare N, Shah S, Agrawal A, Rangarajan V. “Drop” metastases from an operated case of intracranial anaplastic ependymoma identified on fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Indian J Nucl Med 2017;32:68-70 |
How to cite this URL: Chandra P, Purandare N, Shah S, Agrawal A, Rangarajan V. “Drop” metastases from an operated case of intracranial anaplastic ependymoma identified on fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 26];32:68-70. Available from: https://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2017/32/1/68/198492 |
A 30-year-old male, an operated case of anaplastic ependymoma, involving the right cerebellar hemisphere 5 years ago, presented with bilateral lower limb weakness and urinary retention for 1 month. Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) was done for suspected spinal metastases and showed intense FDG uptake in the soft tissue mass eroding the upper sacrum, extending into presacral region and intraspinally up to L2–L3 disc level on maximum intensity projection and fused sagittal PET/CT images [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b, respectively. Postoperative changes were noted in the right cerebellar hemisphere with no evidence of any recurrent/residual disease in the posterior fossa. Correlative sagittal postcontrast magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed an enhancing soft tissue mass in the lumbosacral region [Figure 1]c with diffuse dural enhancement in the lower lumbar region. In addition, sagittal CT of the spine showed another minimally enhancing intramedullary lesion at D4–D5 level [Figure 2]a, which shows low-grade FDG uptake on fused PET/CT images [Figure 2]b. This lesion was best appreciated on the correlative MR spine [Figure 2]c. Biopsy of the sacral mass was positive for anaplastic ependymoma. The patient was treated with palliative chemotherapy and local radiotherapy. | Figure 1: Maximum intensity projection images of fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (a) shows intense tracer uptake in the midline in the lumbosacral region (black arrow). Sagittal fused positron emission tomography computed tomography (b) images shows intense fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake in the large enhancing soft tissue mass involving the upper sacrum and extending intraspinally upto the level of L3–L4 disc space (white arrow head). Postcontrast magnetic resonance sagittal sequence (c) shows intensely enhancing soft tissue mass in the lumbosacral region extending intraspinally along with diffuse enhancement of the dural (white arrow)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: Intramedullary metastatic lesion at the level of D3–D4 which shows minimal enhancement and faint/low-grade fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake (black arrows) on sagittal computed tomography (a) and fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography (b) images, respectively. This lesion was best appreciated on the sagittal magnetic resonance postcontrast sequences (c), as focal intramedullary enhancing lesion (white arrow)
Click here to view |
Metastatic disease to spinal cord usually originates from carcinoma lung, carcinoma breast, melanoma, and renal cell carcinomas.[1],[2] Intramedullary metastases from primary central nervous tumors are rare, and often detected only on autopsy. Intracranial tumors which have a propensity of intraspinal metastases includes (in descending order of frequency) medulloblastoma, ependymoma, pinealoblastomas, astrocytoma, lymphomas, choroid plexus papillomas, and retinoblastomas.[3]
Ependymomas in adults are rare, often misdiagnosed and comprises 3% of all the central nervous system tumors. The WHO classification categorizes ependymomas into Grade I, II, or III. Grade I and II are benign, slow growing tumors and often surgically resectable tumors. Grade III ependymomas, also known as anaplastic ependymomas, are characterized by a higher proliferative rate and a greater tendency to infiltrate surrounding brain or disseminate into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) causing drop metastases.[4],[5] In a large study of patients with ependymoma, cytologic evidence of CSF spread of disease was seen in 12%, with a lower incidence (<5%) of symptomatic leptomeningeal disease.[6],[7] The incidence of CSF spread is, however, less common compared to medulloblastoma and astrocytoma.[6] MRI is the gold standard for detection of leptomeningeal spread of ependydmomas and has better accuracy than CT myelography and CSF cytology. Imaging manifestations are variable and include smooth enhancement along the surface of the spinal cord, enhancing foci in the extramedullary intradural or, occasionally, intramedullary space. The lumbosacral region, especially the most caudal aspect of the thecal sac, is the most common location for “drop” metastases suggesting there could be an association of gravity and seeding of tumor along CSF.[1],[8]
FDG PET/CT is useful in diagnosis and characterization of the central nervous system tumors and the uptake intensity correlates with the type of tumor, histological grade, and survival outcomes.[9] The utility of FDG PET/CT in evaluation of metastatic tumors of spinal cord from primary intracranial malignancies has been demonstrated in few case studies in patients with medulloblastomas and high-grade astrocytoma.[10],[11] Quantitative analysis of intramedullary spinal lesions using FDG PET/CT have shown good correlation between the tumor maximum standardized uptake value and the proliferation index in five patients with high-grade spinal malignancy like anaplastic astrocytoma/ependymoma.[12] Primary ependymomas typically show low-grade FDG concentration with relatively high FDG uptakes seen in anaplastic, tanycytic, and cellular histological subtype than myxopapillary subtype.[13] The above case re-demonstrates the potential utility of PET/CT for diagnosing leptomeningeal spread from primary intracranial tumors and highlights the significance of correlative imaging in evaluating spinal cord tumors.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Findlay JM, Bernstein M, Vanderlinden RG, Resch L. Microsurgical resection of solitary intramedullary spinal cord metastases. Neurosurgery 1987;21:911-5. |
2. | Short RG, Bal S, German JP, Poelstra RJ, Kardan A. Potential of F-18 PET/CT in the detection of leptomeningeal metastasis. Neuroradiol J 2014;27:685-9. |
3. | Stanley P, Senac MO Jr., Segall HD. Intraspinal seeding from intracranial tumors in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:157-61. |
4. | Armstrong TS, Vera-Bolanos E, Bekele BN, Aldape K, Gilbert MR. Adult ependymal tumors: Prognosis and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Neuro Oncol 2010;12:862-70. |
5. | Scheithauer BW, Fuller GN, VandenBerg SR. The 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system: Controversies in surgical neuropathology. Brain Pathol 2008;18:307-16. |
6. | Oppenheim JS, Strauss RC, Mormino J, Sachdev VP, Rothman AS. Ependymomas of the third ventricle. Neurosurgery 1994;34:350-2. |
7. | Qian X, Goumnerova LC, De Girolami U, Cibas ES. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with ependymoma: A bi-institutional retrospective study. Cancer 2008;114:307-14. |
8. | Yuh EL, Barkovich AJ, Gupta N. Imaging of ependymomas: MRI and CT. Childs Nerv Syst 2009;25:1203-13. |
9. | Borgwardt L, Højgaard L, Carstensen H, Laursen H, Nowak M, Thomsen C, et al. Increased fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in childhood CNS tumors is correlated with malignancy grade: A study with FDG positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging coregistration and image fusion. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3030-7. |
10. | Tripathi M, Jain N, Jaimini A, Garg G, D'souza MM, Sharma R, et al. Demonstration of diffuse leptomeningeal metastasis in a treated case of medulloblastoma with F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2009;34:530-2. |
11. | Woesler B, Kuwert T, Probst-Cousin S, Schäfers M, Wassmann H, Gullotta F, et al. Spinal metastases of a high grade astrocytoma visualized with FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med 1997;22:863-4. |
12. | Naito K, Yamagata T, Arima H, Abe J, Tsuyuguchi N, Ohata K, et al. Qualitative analysis of spinal intramedullary lesions using PET/CT. J Neurosurg Spine 2015:1-7. |
13. | Tomura N, Ito Y, Matsuoka H, Saginoya T, Numazawa SI, Mizuno Y, et al. PET findings of intramedullary tumors of the spinal cord using [18F] FDG and [11C] methionine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1278-83. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|