Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine

PICTORIAL ESSAY
Year
: 2018  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 214--217

Dacryoscintigraphy: A pictorial essay


Shefali Madhur Gokhale 
 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Shefali Madhur Gokhale
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, 7-9, Koregaon Park, Pune - 411 001, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

Dacryoscintigraphy is a noninvasive, simple, easy to perform imaging modality used in the evaluation of epiphora. However, it is an infrequently done study in nuclear medicine departments. A standardized protocol and a systematic interpretation of the scans help in answering the queries of the clinicians in cases of epiphora. We have attempted to build a pictorial essay of the various findings detected on dacryoscintigraphy.



How to cite this article:
Gokhale SM. Dacryoscintigraphy: A pictorial essay.Indian J Nucl Med 2018;33:214-217


How to cite this URL:
Gokhale SM. Dacryoscintigraphy: A pictorial essay. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 30 ];33:214-217
Available from: https://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2018/33/3/214/234120


Full Text



 Introduction



Imaging the nasolacrimal system with use of radiopharmaceuticals, in other words, dacryoscintigraphy is an underutilized tool in the present-day nuclear medicine department.

Of the few nuclear medicine departments that perform the procedure, there are differences in the protocol followed, the use of collimators, and the use of radiopharmaceuticals. The indications for the procedure are evaluation of epiphora,[1] detection of subclinical lacrimal duct obstruction, appropriate patient selection for surgery,[2] and evaluating the success of dacryocystorhinostomy.[2] It is contraindicated in acute infective and allergic conditions of the eye. The small size of the structures of the nasolacrimal system is a major limitation. As compared to dacryocystography, the radiation exposure involved is about 100 times lower.[3],[4] It has a distinct advantage over the syringing/saccharin test [5] in being noninvasive.[3] As there is no instrumentation of canaliculi or administration of contrast/saline under high pressure, false-negative and false-positive [3],[5] results are avoided.

The standard protocol that we followed involved the use of Tc-99 m sulfur colloid in a dose of 50–100 microCi/10 μl [3],[5] with the use of low-energy high-resolution collimator and images acquired immediately, postinstillation of normal saline drops and postblowing of the nose.[6]

A systematic interpretation of the various sequences helps arrive at the etiology of epiphora.

Dacryoscintigraphy interpretation in patients presenting with epiphora

To demonstrate normal flow through the nasolacrimal system

A case of dacryocystorhinostomy on the left side in a 26-year-old male patient.

Findings

Drainage of tracer into the nasal cavity within the first 15-min postinstillation of radiopharmaceutical is considered normal.

The left eye reveals flow of tracer to the medial canthus region with accumulation of tracer there. There is no drainage of tracer into the nasal cavity.

The right eye reveals flow of tracer into the lacrimal sac, nasolacrimal duct (NLD), and drainage into the inferior meatus of the nose, all within the first 15-min postinstillation of Tc-99 m sulfur colloid, which is considered as normal [Figure 1].[5],[7]{Figure 1}

Interpretation

Failed dacryocystorhinostomy on the left sideNormal tear flow in the right eye.

To evaluate cause of epiphora in spite of a bilaterally normal syringing test

A 61-year-old female patient had a history of trauma to eyes approximately 2 months back. She had complaints of watering from the right eye for 2 months. Syringing revealed the passage of saline downward into the nasal cavity bilaterally.

Findings

The right eye reveals flow of tracer into the proximal NLD in immediate images. However, there is drainage into the inferior meatus of nose noted only in the images acquired postblowing of the nose.

The left eye reveals partial flow of tracer into the inferior meatus of the nose in the immediate images. There is persistent partial tracer stasis in the region of medical canthus noted in the delayed images [Figure 2]a,[Figure 2]b,[Figure 2]c.{Figure 2}

Interpretation

Intraductal delay right eye with some inflammation at the lower end of NLD, which is relieved by nose blowing.

Partial functional impedance left eye.

The word “functional impedance” is used as an anatomic obstruction which is ruled out by the syringing test.[8] Hence, the finding of syringing test forms an important history in the interpretation of dacryoscintigraphy.

Epiphora since childhood

A 4.5-year-old female patient, a case of right-sided dacryocystitis. She has had complaints of right-sided epiphora since childhood.

Findings and Interpretation

The right eye reveals drainage of tracer into the NLD only in the image acquired postblowing of nose. This could be due to two reasons, either local inflammation at the NLD or resistance offered by the valves of the nasolacrimal system. Since this patient has had complaints since childhood, the symptoms are likely to be secondary to resistance offered by valves.

The left eye reveals drainage of tracer into the left NLD in immediate images. However, there is drainage into the inferior meatus of nose noted in the image acquired postblowing of nose. As the patient is asymptomatic on the left side, scan features are likely to represent local inflammation at the lower end of the left NLD [Figure 3]a,[Figure 3]b,[Figure 3]c.{Figure 3}

Bilateral epiphora, abnormal syringing test

A 64-year-old male patient with complaints of bilateral epiphora for 6–8 months.

There was no passage of saline detected on the syringing test bilaterally.

As there has been no passage of saline on the syringing test, there is likely to be an anatomic obstruction; however, the level of obstruction is to be detected.[5]

Findings

In the right eye, there is flow of tracer to the medial canthus region. However, the delayed images indicate that there is no flow of tracer into the lacrimal sac.

In the left eye, there is flow of tracer to the medial canthus region and lacrimal sac. However, there is no drainage into the NLD [Figure 4]a,[Figure 4]b,[Figure 4]c.{Figure 4}

Interpretation

PRESAC delay right eyePREDUCTAL delay left eye.

Epiphora in old age

A 59-year-old female diabetic and hypertensive patient presented with bilateral epiphora for 3–4 years.

Findings and Interpretation

There is pooling of tracer noted in the orbits bilaterally [Figure 5]a and [Figure 5]b.{Figure 5}

This could be due to either failure of tear flow mechanism in the eyes or laxity of eyelids.

In this case, in view of the age of the patient and comorbidities, scan features are likely to be secondary to eyelid laxity.

To evaluate dacryocystorhinostomy on one side and epiphora on the other side

A 61-year-old male patient had presented with left lacrimal fossa abscess with dacryocystitis. At that time, syringing test had allowed passage of saline in the right eye. He underwent dacryocystorhinostomy on left side.

Findings and interpretation

The left eye reveals flow of tracer to the medial canthus region. However, there is no drainage of tracer into the left NLD. Hence, we conclude that the dacryocystorhinostomy on the left side has failed.

On the right side, we have an important clinical history of the syringing test allowing passage of saline. Hence, there is no anatomical obstruction noted on the right side.

Flow of tracer is noted to the right lacrimal sac. However, there is no drainage of tracer noted into the right NLD. This is a case of preductal delay. In view of the finding of syringing test, it is secondary to functional impedance on the right side [Figure 6]a,[Figure 6]b,[Figure 6]c.{Figure 6}

The word “impedance” is preferred by the ophthalmologists instead of “obstruction,” when the syringing test has allowed passage of saline.[8]

It is important to note that there is no transit of tracer into the NLDs bilaterally in patient V and patient VI. However, patient VI differs in having the flow of tracer to the medial canthus region on right side, hence changing the interpretation of the scans.

 Conclusion



Dacryoscintigraphy is a simple noninvasive and physiological assessment of the nasolacrimal system. A standardized protocol and systematic interpretation would help us identify the cause of epiphora and ascertain the success of surgical procedures performed if any.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Kemeny-Beke A, Szabados L, Barna S, Varga J, Galuska L, Kettesy B, et al. Simultaneous dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy using SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37:609-10.
2Chung YA, Yoo IeR, Oum JS, Kim SH, Sohn HS, Chung SK, et al. The clinical value of dacryoscintigraphy in the selection of surgical approach for patients with functional lacrimal duct obstruction. Ann Nucl Med 2005;19:479-83.
3Reddy SC, Zakaria A, Bhavaraju VM. Evaluation of lacrimal drainage system by radionuclide dacryoscintigraphy in patients with epiphora. Iran J Nucl Med 2016;24:99-106.
4Kim HC, Cho AR, Lew H. Dacryoscintigraphic findings in the children with tearing. Korean J Ophthalmol 2015;29:1-6.
5MacDonald A, Burrell S. Infrequently performed studies in nuclear medicine: Part 1. J Nucl Med Technol 2008;36:132-43.
6BNMS.org. BNMS Clinical Guidelines. Lacrimal Scintigraphy. Available from: https://www.bnms.org.uk. [Approved on 2013 Jun 18].
7Sodee DB. Special imaging procedures. In: Early PJ, Sodee DB, editors. Principles and Practices of Nuclear Medicine. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995. p. 802-18.
8Wearne MJ, Pitts J, Frank J, Rose GE. Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1032-5.