Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 12--22

Global and regional gastric emptying parameters: establishment of reference values and comparison of different camera view methods


Tabassum Saifi1, Abhinav Singhal2, Priyanka Gupta1, Khangembam Bangkim Chandra1, Anil Kumar Pandey1, Chetan Patel1, Rakesh Kumar1 
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Khangembam Bangkim Chandra
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India

Purpose of the Study: The purpose of the study is to establish the reference values of global and regional gastric emptying parameters (GEPs) using a standard vegetarian meal acceptable to the Indian population and compare the values derived on different camera view methods. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six consecutive healthy subjects with age ≥18 years underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy using anterior, posterior, and left anterior oblique (LAO) views. GEP was derived based on decay corrected counts in regions of interest defined on the whole and proximal stomach. Counts in the anterior and posterior view images were used to derive GEP based on geometric mean (GM) method. Comparison of GEP among different camera view methods was done with Friedman test and post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test after Bonferroni correction. Reference values were derived based on percentiles. Results: Rapid gastric emptying based on GM method was defined as percent retention <20% at 1 h while delayed emptying as percent retention >40% and >5% at 2 h and 4 h, respectively. The reference range of half-time of gastric emptying was 23–109 min. The reference value of intragastric meal distribution at time t = 0 was >64%, while the reference range of retention index was 0.7–1.3. Although the overall distribution of GEP derived on different camera view methods could be statistically significant (P < 1.00), the small differences in the derived reference values are likely to be of no clinical significance. Conclusion: The reference values of GEPs established in this study can be generalized for the Indian population and may be applied to aid in clinical decision making. We recommend the GM method as the preferred method, although single view method (LAO preferred over anterior) can also be an acceptable alternative.


How to cite this article:
Saifi T, Singhal A, Gupta P, Chandra KB, Pandey AK, Patel C, Kumar R. Global and regional gastric emptying parameters: establishment of reference values and comparison of different camera view methods.Indian J Nucl Med 2022;37:12-22


How to cite this URL:
Saifi T, Singhal A, Gupta P, Chandra KB, Pandey AK, Patel C, Kumar R. Global and regional gastric emptying parameters: establishment of reference values and comparison of different camera view methods. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 6 ];37:12-22
Available from: https://www.ijnm.in/article.asp?issn=0972-3919;year=2022;volume=37;issue=1;spage=12;epage=22;aulast=Saifi;type=0